The only independent Gluten free Certifiers in the US gfJules

Shopping for Safe Gluten Free Products

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...

Shopping for safe gluten free products should have gotten easier after the FDA’s gluten free food labeling rule became final in 2014. As a celiac, I believe it has actually become harder in many ways.

When I returned from speaking at The Food Allergy Blogger’s Conference in Denver, Colorado, I sat down to write this post. One of the sessions at which I spoke was about activism and advocacy, and I took the opportunity to encourage other bloggers to help educate their readers about how to choose safe gluten free products.

Mind you, this was an audience of food allergy bloggers — if anyone would be aware of how to shop for the safest products, it would be them. While we all agreed that buying products that are certified gluten free is ideal, not everyone knew how to tell the difference between those that are certified by an independent agency and those that are merely called gluten free by the manufacturers themselves. It’s confusing stuff and I’ll tell you why.

FDA Gluten Free Food Labeling Regulations

1in133 logo

1in133.org and all of its supporters in the gluten free community successfully lobbied the FDA to take up the issue of gluten-free food labeling regulations in 2011.

The new FDA gluten free food labeling regulations which we fought so hard for through 1in133.org went into effect in August, of 2014. Those regulations require any manufacturer who wishes to declare that their product is gluten free to ensure that the product contains less than 20 parts per million (ppm) gluten. Oddly enough though, manufacturers are not required to actually test their products or to test in any particular way, with a set frequency or using a preferred testing method. Additionally, they can declare their product gluten-free even if they are produced in a facility with or on equipment with gluten.

We already have some very prominent examples of how this loophole can hurt consumers. Take Cheerios®, for example.

General Mills® announced in 2015 that certain varieties of Cheerios would be made using oats that would be mechanically separated to reduce the amount of gluten-containing grains contaminating the batch (rather than using oats grown, harvested and packaged using the “purity protocol“).* They claimed that each batch would be tested in-house, but the method they used for testing combined multiple boxes which were then ground and the “lot mean” was tested, rather than testing individual boxes for hot spots of contamination.

A Change.org petition was started by some passionate gluten-free bloggers who were afraid for the health of those in the gluten free community who were trusting in the safety of these General Mills products. The flawed testing protocols and the fact that “pure” gluten-free oats were not being used caused great concern to many who had taken the time to look deeper into how General Mills was producing this product. Gluten-Free Watchdog became involved and together, the voices of concern began to be heard above General Mills’ corporate messaging. Sadly, gluten-free people around the country began to report that they had been made sick by “gluten free” Cheerios.*

Then in October, 2015 General Mills disclosed that its Lodi, California plant had failed to test any of the lots of “gluten free” Cheerios for a period of 13 days. During this period, the oats had also been transported in containers which had been used for wheat, so the oats were further contaminated — a situation General Mills was unaware of until customer complaints lodged with the Gluten Free Watchdog and later with the FDA brought it to their attention, necessitating a recall of 1.8 million boxes produced during that 13 day period.

The remaining “gluten free” labeled Cheerios are still on store shelves despite numerous reports of illness, but unless and until it is proved that General Mills has actually produced other individual boxes sold as “gluten free” that contain over 20 ppm gluten, General Mills is still technically in compliance with the FDA rule. Safe for celiacs? Worth risking your health for? You be the judge.

Update: July 2017:

Reports of illness from Cheerios continue to stream in to the FDA. Buzzfeed filed a Freedom of Information Request and reported on the claims which are still being made by celiacs and others who say they’ve been sickened by Cheerios. Jocelyn Silvester, a physician at Boston Children’s Hospital, says that her team recommends patients with celiac disease avoid products made with mechanically-optically separated oats, noting that it remains unclear whether any given product is safe and there is no reliable tool to find out for sure.

quaker gluten free oats*And in case you’re wondering, Cheerios isn’t the only brand using this type of mechanical sorting of oats. Quaker® has now released a line of “gluten free” oats and other sellers of oats labeled as “gluten free” also utilize this method to remove gluten-containing grains from oats not grown according to the purity protocol. Unless the brand is listed in this list compiled by the Gluten Free Watchdog, it is not using pure oats for its “gluten free” oats.

Gluten in Cheerios Update: October 2017:

The Canadian Celiac Association has released this news: “The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) has made an announcement that the words “gluten-free” will be removed from all Cheerios package sold in Canada by January 1, 2018.” However, General Mills has said it will not remove any boxes currently labeled gluten-free; it will not label Cheerios as gluten-free with replenishment of stock.

Melissa Secord, Executive Director of the Canadian Celiac Association elaborated, “Based on the advice of the members of our Professional Advisory Board, the experts of the Gluten-Free Certification Program, and other professionals working in the field, we believe that there is not adequate evidence to support the claim. When added to many reports from consumers with celiac disease reacting to eating the cereal, we believe this is the safe recommendation for Canadians.”

We can only hope that the FDA follows suit so that Cheerios sold in the U.S. will no longer be labeled gluten-free, but it will only happen if they hear from enough consumers to merit the change.

Independent, Third Party Gluten Free Certification Organizations

The definition of “certifier” is to vouch for the authenticity of something, or to certify to the facts. In the U.S., there are four recognized independent certifiers of gluten free products. These agencies test, audit, train and certify that products within their purview test to (at least) below 20 ppm gluten, the current FDA standard. They also have the ability to require their manufacturing customers order recalls or re-labeling if a product does not meet their testing standards. These assurances exist to protect gluten free consumers and to give them confidence in the safety of their certified products.

If you wish to buy products which have been independently tested by a third party, look for the words “CERTIFIED GLUTEN FREE” or “CERTIFICATION” and one of these symbols on the products you buy:

1GF Certifications Collage - gfJules

The 4 symbols in the United States which indicate INDEPENDENTLY CERTIFIED gluten free products.

The only independent Gluten free Certifiers in the US gfJules

The Gluten Free Certification Organization — probably the most well-known of all the certifiers, uses a clear black and white “Certified Gluten Free” mark. The GFCO certifies tens of thousands of products in the U.S. and internationally. Requirements include gluten testing to less than 10 ppm gluten, even though the FDA only requires less than 20 ppm gluten. (Full disclosure: my gfJules products are all certified by the GFCO)

The National Celiac Association — formerly the Celiac Support Organization, this organization requires gluten testing to less than 5 ppm gluten, but also certifies some products which are “gluten removed” like beers made with gluten ingredients, for which experts agree current testing is insufficient to read gluten levels accurately.

Beyond Celiac Gluten Free Certification Program — formerly National Foundation for Celiac Awareness has endorsed and partnered with the Canadian Gluten Free Certification Program. The program certifies hundreds of brands and thousands of products in Canada and the U.S.

NSF (National Sanitation Foundation) — offers a separate gluten free certification which tests products to less than 15 ppm gluten.

If General Mills had instead subjected its products to an independent third party certifier, each batch of product have been tested according to more stringent protocols. Such testing would have avoided at least the Lodi disaster, but also the potential for other contaminated boxes to be released into the market because of the lot mean testing methods currently used. There would also have been an immediate examination of methods, testing and ingredients upon receipt of customer complaints, and a recall could have been ordered more quickly, sparing people from illness.

No system is perfect, but by using one of the 4 independent certifying agencies currently in the U.S., Cheerios (and any other product claiming to be gluten free) would be much more likely to be truly gluten free and therefore safe for those adhering to a gluten free diet. These organizations not only test the end products before distribution, but they also review ingredient sourcing, help develop employee training, and audit and inspect cleaning practices and cross-contamination controls throughout the entire manufacturing process. Note: if a product passes their testing protocols, it still MAY BE produced in a facility which also processes gluten — confusing, but still permitted.

Avoid Labeling Confusion

Do not be confused by other labels that may look like independent certifications. Here are some examples of symbols that DO NOT indicate independent certifications:

other-gf-symbols-not-certified-gfJules

Gluten Free Certification Seals gfJules.com

There has even been a lawsuit filed in 2018 regarding Bob’s Red Mill’s use of gluten free logo that is alleged to be confusingly similar to the GFCO gluten free logo.

Products produced in dedicated gluten free facilities may indicate that fact on their packaging or on their company websites. This isolation goes a long way toward ensuring the gluten free status of the finished product, but I urge manufacturers to also require the raw ingredients for those products and their final gluten status to be tested independently and confirmed before being sold as gluten free, in order to ensure customer safety.

If you have any questions about the gluten free status of a particular product, contact that manufacturer directly and inquire as to their cross-contamination prevention procedures and what testing they do. And while you’re at it, encourage them to seek independent gluten free certification from one of the four organizations which offer these services in the U.S. If the company truly wants to ensure the safety of their products for gluten free consumers, they should embrace the oversight, training, auditing and certification label they’ll receive for their products by being affiliated with one of these independent agencies.

*For more information on why gluten-free experts are not satisfied with General Mills’ current testing protocols for Cheerios boxes labeled “gluten free,” read The Gluten Free Watchdog.

radio microphoneTo learn more about “mechanically separated” versus “purity protocol” oats, listen to this “Gluten Free Voice” free podcast.

 

Gluten Free Certification Seals gfJules.com

Summary
Shopping for Safe Gluten Free Products
Article Name
Shopping for Safe Gluten Free Products
Description
Shopping for safe gluten free products after the FDA's gluten free food labeling rule became final. How-to guide from expert Jules Shepard.
Author
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

10 thoughts on “Shopping for Safe Gluten Free Products

  1. Pingback: 7th Annual Gluten Free Cookie Swap! - Gluten free recipes - gfJules - with the REAL Jules

  2. Pingback: Gluten Free Cookie Swap - Gluten free recipes - gfJules - with the REAL Jules

  3. I recently had a severe reaction to a new gluten free protein pancake mix and could not figure out why because it had the correct symbol designating that it is certified gluten free; then I read one of your articles about other ingredients to be leery of when you’re gluten free. As luck would have it, three of the items listed were items that I have suspected as being those that created problems for me. It also contained gluten free OAT flour which I didn’t even know existed!
    My reaction to this product brought to mind many questions; how does a baking company becomes certified – does the company write someone and say “yep we’re now gluten free”? Or is there a group that tests their products on a continual basis to verify their statements? So, at the suggestion of Jules, I came back to your website and read an article about how that happens and I also read your list of certified companies. The company that I made this purchase from stated this was a new product and kind of gave me the impression that they were so new that they wouldn’t yet be on anyone’s list.
    As you’ve probably figured out, I am fairly new to eating gluten free and naive me thought that once I solved the problem with gluten I would be free of any more severe reactions.
    I find now that there is so much more to this “new world” of eating and I have so much to learn

  4. Pingback: Looking forward to 2016

  5. Pingback: Gluten-Free Label Reading 101 - Gluten free recipes - gfJules - with the REAL Jules

  6. Pingback: Gluten Free Oats Safe for Celiacs - Gluten free recipes - gfJules - with the REAL Jules

  7. Pingback: Are Oats Safe on a Gluten-Free Diet? - Gluten free recipes - gfJules - with the REAL Jules

  8. Pingback: Homemade Almond Flour or Gluten Free Oat Flour - Gluten free recipes - gfJules - with the REAL Jules

  9. First, the GFCO should sue Frito Lay under trademark law for using a confusingly similar mark.

    Second, every Celiac sufferer should read about how Kosher goods are labeled. It may look kosher, but without the certifying mark, you can’t really be sure.

    • Thanks for your comment, Scott. I can’t say I disagree about the confusingly similar mark, which is why I included it here. Kosher certs have been around much longer and as far as I know, there are only 2 marks. It’s a much more convoluded situation with GF – I do hope we can quickly figure a way to make it more clear to the consumer.
      ~jules